Skip to Content

Building your Fujifilm Photography Kit Part 2: The Lenses

Disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links. I earn a small commission of product sales to keep this website going.

I got some heat on my last article about choosing a Fujifilm camera for not listing every Fujifilm camera and every photography genre. That wasn’t my intention! My intention was to help you through the practical thought process to make your own decisions based on the factors that are important. And that’s what I’m going to do here with the second part of this series, choosing a Fujifilm lens.

I’m not going to compare the image quality and technical specifications of the 35mm f/1.4 and 35mm f/2, for example. There are plenty of articles out there that do this. Because how do you even know you need a 35mm prime lens in the first place? That’s what we’ll look at here.

Fujifilm lenses, like all lenses, have some alphabet soup in their names. You can read more about what all of the different Fujifilm lens abbreviations mean in this article. This’ll help you make sense of some of the features found in these lenses as we go through the article.

I’m going to limit this article to mostly Fujifilm lenses; not many third-party lens manufacturers have made lenses for the Fujifilm X system up to this point although they’re starting to spring up now. All focal lengths will be listed for APS-C sensors.

Let’s talk Primes vs Zooms

Primes are better than zooms.
No, zooms are better than primes!

Ah, a timeless argument that’s been going on for decades in the Internet forums. Thankfully (or unthankfully?) there’s no correct answer. It’s all subjective and dependent on the photographer’s needs.

Where primes excel

A prime lens is one that has a fixed focal length, or field of view.

Because of this, engineers are able to design & build it to be optimized for that one focal length, rather than needing to cover a range of focal lengths like zoom lenses. This type of construction gives it many advantages:

  • Small size & weight
  • Much larger maximum aperture vs comparable zoom lens (for more shallow depth-of-field and working in low light)
  • Sharper all-around, particularly on the edges and corners of the image
  • Clearer contrast & color rendition with less fringing/aberrations

Some folks also say that prime lenses have more “character” than zoom lenses. For example, I absolutely love the contrast reproduced with the Fujinon 16mm f/1.4. It is noticeable when you compare it to Fujinon zoom lenses.

The optical characteristics may have you enthusiastically saying, “yes, primes are better and I need a prime!”

But wait!

For the most part, these characteristics are really only noticeable if you’re looking for them, comparing two photos of the same thing using different lenses. Remember, that’s not how people view your photos. All I’m getting at is, don’t feel like you need to get prime lenses for better pictures. Fujifilm makes some amazing zoom lenses, some of which are better than primes.


memberbanner

Where zooms excel

A zoom lens is capable of covering a range of focal lengths, from ultra-wide to wide, wide to telephoto, telephoto to extreme telephoto, and everything in between.

Because these lenses need to cover a range of focal lengths, the optical design can’t be optimized for just one focal length. There’s a little give-and-take to get the best possible quality out of the entire zoom range. With that said, the sacrifice is worth it for many people for the following reasons:

  • No need to change lenses to get different focal lengths
  • Can carry fewer lenses (sometimes just one) to cover a wide focal range
  • A much more cost-effective option to buy one zoom rather than several primes

As mentioned earlier, Fujifilm makes some great zoom lenses. So even though, in theory, the optics are better in prime lenses, you’ll be hard-pressed to notice degraded quality in their zoom lenses unless you’re looking for it.

However, this can make a big difference for high-end commercial & portrait photographers.

Lens purchasing philosophy

If you remember from Part 1 of this series, I recommend making your main investment in the lens rather than the camera body. Camera bodies come and go, but you’ll have the lenses forever.

The 16-55mm f/2.8 has been my primary travel & documentary lens from the X-T1 to the X-T4.

Look at your entire budget. Get the best lens you can while having some money left over for the minimum camera that meets your needs. Upgrade the camera later if you need to, not the lens. All Fujifilm cameras rock, you can’t go wrong.

Along that note, don’t be afraid to buy used either! These lenses are constructed extremely well. They hold their value. I’ve never had a problem with a used lens. If buying a used Fujifilm lens can save you a couple hundred bucks to afford a better lens, another lens, or a better camera body, then go for it! You can buy from the used departments at B&H Photo, Adorama, or even on eBay.

Like with the cameras, try to avoid buying a lens for no other reason than, “this guy likes it, so I’ll get it to.” There’s got to be other reasons! We will discuss many of those reasons in the next section.

For those of you who have been photographing for a while, what were your favorite lenses in your previous camera system? Wouldn’t the equivalent lens transfer over to the Fujifilm system? If you use Lightroom Classic or Photo Mechanic Plus, you can use the Library filters to show you which lenses you’ve used the most.

And finally, getting back to the primes vs. zooms discussion, really take a minute to think about how you’ll be using the lenses. Will you be traveling light with a minimal kit, in damp or dusty environments, not wanting to change out prime lenses all the time? Then you’ll probably want to keep a good zoom on your camera. But if you’ll be in a controlled environment, like a studio or doing outdoor portraits, then maybe you won’t mind changing between a couple of good primes.

Buying the Fujifilm lens(es) for you

So now let’s get into the details, looking at Fujifilm lens features and your photography style to figure out which Fujifilm lens is right for you.

And again, there is no way I can go into deep-dive lens comparisons for every single lens in this article. This is simply to get you started.

Please note that all of the links are affiliate links as bloggers do; if you make a purchase I’ll get a tiny percentage of the sale to keep this website going.

Based on lens characteristics

Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a great feature for photographers who will be doing a lot of handheld photography in low light. If you’ll be at slower shutter speeds and using a tripod is impractical, this can be a great feature. Keep in mind that some Fujiifilm cameras have this built in to the body, so that can take the place of an OIS lens. The photo below was taken with the 18-135mm lens at 41mm (equiv 65mm), handheld, at 1/2 second. Pretty dang sharp for a half-second exposure handheld!

image stabilization

Weather resistance (WR) is a must-have for photographers who will be in austere conditions. If you’re constantly photographing in damp ocean environments, dusty wind-blown deserts or beaches, rainforests, etc., this is a great way to protect your investment. All Fujifilm lenses are constructed very well and offer some degree of protection. But I’ve been amazed at some of the places I’ve been able to take a WR lens without any dust or water intrustion at all. Just keep in mind you’ll need a camera with weather sealing as well (X-T1/2/3/4, X-Pro1/2/3, X-H1).

Size & weight is an important consideration for folks who travel or go on backpacking trips. One zoom lens might be larger and heavier than a prime, but you’ll need to carry several primes to cover the range of the one zoom.

The maximum aperture is something you’ll want to look at if you’ll be photographing in very low light (astrophotography, indoor events) and/or you need that extremely shallow depth of field for portraits. In these cases, you may want lenses in the f/1.4-f/2.0 range. Otherwise, I wouldn’t worry too much about the maximum aperture.

Based on your photography style

Travel & documentary photographers

Photographers who are on the move in fast-paced environments, who are capturing different types of scenes and don’t have the luxury of time to swap out lenses, are most likely going to want a good zoom lens.

As previously mentioned, the Fujinon 16-55mm f/2.8 (“Red Badge” series) is on my camera most of the time when doing this kind of photography and I’m perfectly happy with that. It has weather sealing but no stabilization (that’s a moot point after the X-T4 came out). Alternatives:

  • The 18-55mm f/2.8-4 doesn’t go quite as wide on the focal length, doesn’t have weather sealing, and has a maximum aperture one stop smaller when zoomed in. But it is significantly smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the 16-55mm f/2.8. It does feature image stabilization, making up for the fact that the maximum aperture isn’t fixed at f/2.8.
  • If 55mm doesn’t offer enough on the telephoto end, the newer 16-80mm f/4 lens will give you some extra reach. This lens is also cheaper and smaller than the 16-55mm f/2.8, but the barrel does extend quite a bit when zoomed. This lens also features weather sealing and image stabilization. Article: Fujinon 16-55mm vs 16-80mm.
  • Maybe 80mm isn’t enough zoom for you either. The 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 covers the focal range that any travel/documentary photographer could want in one single lens. It features weather sealing and image stabilization. Article: Review of the Fujinon 18-135mm.
documentary fujifilm lenses
L-R on an X-T4: 16-55mm f/2.8, 16-80mm f/4, 18-55mm f/2.8-4, 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6. From camerasize.com.

Nature & wildlife photographers

If you’re maintaining your physical distance from your subjects but still want to get “close” photos, you’ll need a longer zoom lens to get that reach. Having zoom lenses, rather than primes, for this genre also gives you the flexibility to recompose based on the changing distance of your subject.

There are an overwhelming number of options for Fujifilm lenses for nature & wildlife. Choosing one will depend on your budget primarily, but also your distance to your subject. The pricey 100-400mm f/4-5.6 would be good if you’re maintaining your distance but want to be able to zoom in really close. And if you have almost $2,000 to spend.

You might want to look at the 50-140mm f/2.8 – it’s a very versatile lens for many different subjects – and you can throw a 2x teleconverter on it when you need to multiply the focal length for some extra reach (it becomes a 100-280mm f/5.6). This combo can be a very versatile solution.

If those lenses are out of your budget, you also have the older 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 and the newer 70-300mm f/4-5.6. While these lenses are smaller & more affordable, the optical construction isn’t quite as superior. Still, they’re great options. The 55-200mm won’t work with the teleconverters.

All of these lenses feature optical image stabilization and weather sealing, with the exception of the 55-200mm lens, which does not feature weather sealing.

wildlife fujifilm lenses
L-R on an X-T4: 100-400mm f/4-5.6, 50-140mm f/2.8, 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8, 70-300mm f/4-5.6. From camerasize.com.

Landscape photographers

I enjoy zoom lenses for landscape photography, like the 16-55mm f/2.8 or the 16-80mm f/4. Wide enough for most of what I do, though I still do enjoy also having a longer zoom for tighter, compressed photos (see telephoto zooms in the above section). It’s good to have WR lenses if you’re outside most of the time.

For many landscape photographers, 16mm isn’t quite wide enough for those sweeping landscapes and massive skies. Fujifilm does make some great wider zooms. There’s the more expensive 8-16mm f/2.8 and more affordable 10-24mm f/4. Neither of these are very small lenses; keep that in mind if you’ll be carrying your kit for long distances.

You could also get a wide prime, and for that my favorite is the Samyang/Rokinon 12mm f/2. This is a manual-focus third-party lens, but it’s very affordable, small, and phenomenal for landscapes and astrophotography. It’s manual focus only, but that shouldn’t be a problem for you with Fujifilm’s manual focus aids.

fujifilm landscape lenses
From L-R on an X-T4: 16-55mm f/2.8, 8-16mm f/2.8, 10-24mm f/4, Rokinon 12mm f/2. From camerasize.com.

Portrait photographers

memberrect

Portrait photographers tend to prefer prime lenses with wide apertures, helping them throw the background more out of focus to further isolate their subjects. Primes are often great in these scenarios since you can easily move closer to or further from your subject to alter the composition (zooming with your feet!).

There are numerous Fujifilm lenses for portrait photography out there, but you’ll want to look at three primary factors when choosing them:

  • Price
  • Focal length
  • Maximum aperture

As far as focal lengths are concerned, beware of going too wide. You’ll get some distortion, especially if you’re close to your subject, giving them big noses and such. While these wide focal lengths (like 16mm) are great for environmental portraits, where you’re also grabbing your subject’s environment, they’re not ideal for your standard portraits.

Most portrait photographers start with a 35mm lens, and over time, add a 23mm lens and a 50mm or 56mm lens. Fujifilm makes numerous lenses of the 23mm, 35mm, and 50-56mm focal lengths with maximum apertures ranging from f/1.0 – f/2.0. The wider the maximum aperture, the larger & more expensive the lens will be.

A 23mm wider lens will have more background in the picture, which can be a problem if the background is distracting. The “background blur” effect won’t be as pronounced due to the wider focal length, especially if you’re far from your subject.

A 50mm telephoto lens will “compress” the scene, narrowing what’s seen in the background, which can greatly reduce those background distractions. It can also really throw that background out of focus more, especially if you’re doing a close-up.

Also, don’t feel like you need that f/1.0 or f/1.2 lens to get background blur. You’ll be just fine with an f/1.4 or f/2. The problem with these f/1.0-1.2 lenses is that the depth of field is too shallow for many. If you’re not on your game, eyelashes can be in focus while the eye pupil is out of focus. Hell, this happens at f/1.4 and f/2 also, so beware.

portrait fujifilm lenses
From L-R on an X-Pro3: 35mm f/2, 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/2, 50mm f/1. From camerasize.com.

Street photographers

Street photographers also tend to choose prime lenses, but for different reasons.

Imagine casually walking around the city, capturing pictures of strangers, with a 50-140mm f/2.8 on the camera. You’ll stand out like a sore thumb with that massive piece of metal in front of your face! You’ll intimidate the people you approach as you request to capture their photo. Not to mention the fatigue of carrying it for a few hours.

Inconspicuousness is the theme here, and small primes like the ones mentioned above are the best bet. I personally prefer a 23mm to 27mm focal length since those approximate the human field of vision. 35mm is also a popular focal length for street photography.

fujifilm street photography lenses
Which one would you rather carry around on the street? L-R on an X-E4: 16-55mm f/2.8, 27mm f/2.8. From camerasize.com.

Event & wedding photographers

If you only have one camera for these events, you’ll primarily want to use a standard zoom like in the Documentary section above.

You might also want a prime like a 35mm to switch over to for a mini-portrait session within the event, and if you have a secondary camera body, you can keep this prime lens on your other camera.

Choosing Fujifilm lenses for your kit

Apologies for not covering every single photography niche and reviewing every single Fujifilm lens, including third-party lenses. That’s not what I wanted to do here – I wanted to provide you with a thought process for choosing a Fujifilm lens. A thought process based on:

  • Your budget
  • Where you photograph
  • What you photograph
  • How you photograph

I truly do believe that you should budget and consider your lens before the camera, as discussed in Part 1 of this series.

All Fujifilm XF lenses are good lenses. Get the best one(s) you can afford, that suits your style, and you’ll have them forever. Because they’re so good, don’t be afraid to buy used Fujifilm lenses either!

And don’t fall for the “Fujifilm XF50mm f/1.0 Is The Best Portrait Lens” articles. That lens is a huge, expensive beast of a lens and is tricky to use at f/1.0 – and may not be the best for you. The same caution applies for any article that says “get this lens if you want good photographs.”

You build your kit based on your own situation and let the soul of your photographs do the talking. I hope the approach outlined in this article helps you do that. Because in real life, people won’t be analyzing your photo pixel-by-pixel and critique your choice of the 35mm f/2 instead of the 35mm f/1.4. You can learn how to make the best of these lenses in the courses included in my Fujifilm X Photography Course Membership.

You can read Part 3 of this series, Finishing your Fujifilm kit with accessories.

hpchavaz

Saturday 18th of September 2021

Another criterion that seems to me to be taken into account for the choice of lenses is the type of camera, even if of course all lenses work perfectly on all the cameras, even if ,as ideally the camera and the lenses should be suitable for the type of photography that is practiced, the criterion may seem superfluous.

Nevertheless ...

In my experience, the X-Pro and X-E type cameras, but this applies to all cameras with a viewfinder shifted to the left, make the use of the larger lenses less pleasant. Indeed, they lead to a posture in which the right arm is a little less attached to the body, while the camera is held directly by the sole right hand, the second one being further away under the lens.

In a similar way, a lens like the XF 50-140 will be more balanced with a camera like the X-H1 or an X-T4 with a grip, than on a small camera like the X-S10.

Finally, concerning the X-Pro whose interest compared to the X-E lies essentially in their OVF, this OVF introduces two factors.

The first one is that the OVF has in the best case (X-Pro1 and X-Pro2) only two levels of magnification (one can wonder what madness struck Fujifilm to keep only one level on the x-Pro3). Also, the OVF becomes unusable when you go out of a rather restricted focal length range, in fact and it is not a coincidence, that of the first range of lenses: 18mm - 55mm.

The second is that as much as possible the lens and its hood, should not be too present in the field of the OVF. From this point of view, an XF23mmF2 is more suitable than the latest XF23mmF1.4. Incidentally, square or ventilated lens hoods are perfect.

Charlie

Sunday 12th of September 2021

Thanks for some great information. I've been doing research about lenses for portraits. I'm a beginner. Question: When you mention the lenses in the paragraph about portraits were you referring to the Fuji lens focal lengths or equivalent focal lengths. For example, you wrote that most beginning portrait photographers start with a 35mm lens. I was thinking you meant full frame equivalent. But, just checking to make sure. I was thinking of something a bit longer than 35 FFE to compress better and so I don't need to come in so tight physically. But, not sure if that is logical or not. Thanks again for a very useful article!

John Peltier

Monday 13th of September 2021

Hi Charlie, I believe I mentioned this in the beginning, but if not, all focal lengths listed here are the actual focal length numbers you see on the lens. So when I say 35mm in this post, that's a Fujifilm 35mm lens, which gives you a field of view equivalent to 50mm.

Rick

Sunday 12th of September 2021

Good extensive intro to Fuji X lenses. After shooting Fuji for some years now, and have owned most of Fuji lenses, as a nature photographer, I ended up using three camera-lens combinations: Fuji X-H1 with a macro lens (80mm for rainy days, Laowa for clear days), Fuji X100V for landscape and all general shots, and a second hand Canon 7D II, with 400mm 5.6 for birds and critters. This last combination because of autofocus and the lack of a prime tele lens by Fuji.

Having these three combo's, that all, for me, excel in their specific area, keeps me from wanting other gear. I couldn't find one camera to do it all. Maybe the Canon R5, but I do not like a screen that is not lined up with the lens, and it is expensive.

All things considered, it is another approach looking at lenses and camera's. One might find second hand body's for cheap, that are very good in one kind of photography. For macro, full frame for example is a disadvantage in my eyes (you have to close down aperture further for depth of field, and that decreases the amount of available light).

Also for birds in flight I like the APS-C crop. After photographing for some years, I found I'm not into super shallow depth of field. Only for the birding I sometimes would like to have a more blown out background. But if I would go full frame, I would need a 600mm lens. And since I am really into primes, that would be a price I am not willing to pay. Or a very high megapixel full frame body where you can crop to APS-C size. The only candidate is the Sony A7R4 currently, but Sony does not have an affordable 400mm in their line-up.

There are two things to keep in mind: you mostly do not take all three combinations out, so in my case, it is either macro or birds. The X100V is always with me. The other thing is, there is no wide angle here, as I found, that up till now I did not happen to like shooting that.

John Peltier

Monday 13th of September 2021

Yes, I suppose as long as you're not taking all of those systems out at the same time, that's another viable option!

wolfgang

Saturday 28th of August 2021

Great article. Nice to read that all my lenses were mentioned: Fuji 35 2,0 / 18-55 2,8-4,0 / 55-200 3,5-4,8 / Samyang 12 2,0. Fully satisfied with all of them (size, weight, image quality). Need nothing more. Bought the 18-55 as used lens. Often kit-lenses are considered poor. Not for this one. It remains a great lens.

John Peltier

Sunday 29th of August 2021

That's a great, diverse lens kit! I used the 18-55 when I first switched to Fujifilm and was hesitant because it came as a "kit." But it's an awesome lens!

DCraig

Friday 27th of August 2021

Although I'm not a Fujifilm shooter, I always appreciate your informative content -- it is so often a wonderful review of things I've simply forgotten to think about. It is so true that it is the glass that matters, especially today. I keep two primes, one at the fast, wide end for astro and one at the very long end for the little birds and things, otherwise I'm 90% zoom (the trilogy) for the landscapes and documentary work I do. If I was starting from scratch, I might be seduced by the Fujifilm system, but I'm staying where my glass is (and getting better workouts with the camera pack on).

Hey, don't breathe up there. It's been miserable in Carson Valley and I certainly fear for those closer to the source. Stay safe. dcraig

John Peltier

Sunday 29th of August 2021

Thanks buddy! Yes, if you're heavily invested in some great lenses for your current system, and you're happy with it, it sure is difficult to justify the switch. We've got an air purifier going full-blast in the house and it's just enough to remove the smoke entering the house - but we'll probably be leaving in the next couple of days the way the forecast is!